<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Rant on Res Futuras</title><link>https://resfuturas.com/tags/rant/</link><description>Recent content in Rant on Res Futuras</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://resfuturas.com/tags/rant/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Living Between the 0s and 1s</title><link>https://resfuturas.com/posts/living-between-the-0s-and-1s/</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://resfuturas.com/posts/living-between-the-0s-and-1s/</guid><description>Most frameworks break because they take everything to its logical conclusion. Sounds smart. Clean. Defensible. But what it actually does is kill nuance. It strips away the messy part, the human part. You end up with rigid principles that are easy to follow and almost impossible to bend when reality doesn’t fit. And fuck&amp;hellip; reality rarely fits.
This isn’t just theory. You see it in everyday interactions. You call a company, there’s a person on the other end, but they’re not really acting like a person anymore.</description></item></channel></rss>